Another small difference is that Q701 comes with a Quincy Jones line logo on the earcups that close the cups, but that doesn't seem to make any noticeable difference in our measurements. Ramblings. Fresh pads vs somewhat compressed pads. It's been a love and hate relationship with my AKG K702 until I stumbled upon your post. Deviations in different severities at different frequency bands have an effect on the sound character. Below an aid to help determining the sound character of headphones with relation to the frequency response. The filtered K702 (the right plots) show the overshoot is removed but there still is a second pulse. Below the K702 vs the K612.The K612 (a better extended K601) is considered ‘neutral’ with a forward sound and sharpish treble. Re: AKG K701 Frequency Response and CSD Waterfall Plots « Reply #27 on: June 21, 2013, 05:51:37 PM » I agree that the K702 is a good headphone based on my experience with the anniversary edition. Close but no cigar. The AKG K702 are great, comfortable headphones for critical listening but are mediocre for everyday casual use. The AKG K712 PRO deliver a great sound for critical listening. The lower frequencies are quite well damped and ‘stop’ fast. They combine an extremely accurate response with agility and spaciousness. The K702 is an open headphone with a dynamic driver. put them under the same test bench, The AKG K702 share the same style and build as the AKG K701 and AKG K712 PRO. Above 18kHz the response drops off quickly but still shows response at least up to 30kHz. power rating: 0.2W (200mW) Revolutionary flat wire voice coil for incredible impulse and treble response New & Used (28) from $309.00 + FREE Shipping. Frequency response (tonal balance) is the most sound-determining aspect of headphones. Their open design doesn't block any noise and leaks enough to be distracting. The jagged response above 5kHz makes the treble a bit ‘coarse’. They're not designed for sports and only stay in place during casual listening sessions. Below the frequency response of the K702 with the filter. On some recordings there is still some sibilance audible but the excessive brightness is removed. The small ‘bump’ around 2kHz makes the mids sound a bit too ‘forward’ but not in an annoying way. Above 10kHz the resonances are visible but are also short. Aside from a small correction of the microphone itself also some correction in the lowest frequencies is applied to the plots to compensate for the perceived loss of bass when using headphones. Below the square-wave response of the K702. AKG K702 = a proper open back, sounds absolutely amazing straight out the box, perhaps a shade lacking in volume level due to the 200mW drivers, the sub bass interferes with the vocals, backing the volume off a little solves that. Bass extension isn’t great and it starts to audibly roll-off from 100Hz down. When a product is discontinued or no longer popular, we sell the purchased products locally in Montreal, Canada. Inner pad dimensions: Ø 60mm , depth front: 20mm, depth rear: 25mm Is the K702 with K712 pads exactly the same as a K712 ? The MSRP is around €350.- but retail price (2019) is around €140.-. The shape of your head, bone structure, pad size, pad ‘softness,  (compliance), hair or no hair and or wearing glasses may (drastically) change the frequency response of some headphones, so… your personal experience may differ substantially from these plots. To compensate for this the amplifier is cranked up to the same level (9.4dB at 1kHz) as the low impedance amplifier. The AKG are also a bit more open-sounding, and they come with a very long and detachable cable while the Beyerdynamic have a short, coiled cable. AKG K7XX Red. Efficiency: 90dB/1mW (103dB/1V) This is a comfortable headphone that can be tweaked in sound by using different AKG pads. Recent Comment. Below: Perfect seal, a small seal breach by thin armed (reading) glasses just above the skin, thick armed glasses and a big seal breach.A seal breach isn’t really problematic at all. Accessories: 3.5mm adapter. Nunc pulvinar sollicitudin … The headband can adjust over a wide range but isn’t padded. Below the K702 vs the K701 The K712 will sound less harsh to most people, but their soundstage isn't as impressive. Sound-wise, the AKG might lack a bit of sub-bass when compared to the Beyerdynamic and could sound a bit sharper on higher frequencies. Published: Feb-3-2020, updated: Aug-8-2020. In-Ear Fidelity is supported by the following: Support those who support us! Impedance: 65Ω The tonal balance is hardly changed when listening to these headphones with or without glasses. The pads are velour with standard foam inside and have a 5° angle . Be part of the most informed community and take advantage of our advanced tools to find the best product for your needs. IEM Graph Comparison Tool. The retro headband design is also quite large and results in a headphone that's cumbersome to carry around, and that will only fit in a backpack. The K702 is also a fantastic purchase, and has a bit of a different sound signature. Related: AKG K701 vs. K702 It lacks in ‘finesse’ but is above average in quality. (website links), Foobar 2000 for Dummies (Part 1) – General Setup, Foobar 2000 for Dummies (Part 2) – Playing DSD – New SACD plugin (0.9.x and 1.x.x Series), power, efficiency, levels, balanced, impedance. Frequency Response Graph Unfortunately I can’t find a frequency graph for the K612 (at the time of writing) – so I’ve used the K702 and K601 graphs – mainly because it fairly closely matches what I think I’m hearing. Both units extend well beyond what the typical adult ear is able to perceive, so a more palpable difference is in weight. Below the K702 vs the K501.The K501 is an oldie. AKG Pro K702 has a frequency response of 10 Hz to 39,800 Hz. Demo units courtesy of: Frequency Response measurements and graphs for In-Ear Monitors (IEMs) and earphones. It can also be used for the K612 and K701. Each had those annoying head band bumps that a lot of people complained about. Forums. The ear cups will sway and slip off you ears, even during mild physical activity. This headphone is quite comfortable and can be worn for long periods without getting too ‘hot’ on the ears. The AKG K702 and the Beyerdynamic DT 880 are both great audiophile headphones if you like a neutral sound. Due to their open-back design, these headphones don't offer any isolation below 1KHz. See frequency response graph. These headphones are not tight enough and will easily fall your head if used while running. Perhaps the only real difference is color and the fixed cable to justify the price difference. The effect of this filter is shown below. Poor isolaton. frequency response graphs, CSD waterfall plots, subjective gear reviews. On a higher output resistance amplifier the output level will be considerably lower. Clamping force: medium Bass hardly reacts. The K371 has titanium-coated drivers and a greater frequency response extending from 5Hz-40kHz compared to the K361's 15Hz-28kHz frequency response. Driver type: dynamic The K702 is also a fantastic purchase, and has a bit of a different sound signature. Most people won’t hear a difference between those two models. On the left from top to bottom 40Hz, 440Hz square wave and on the bottom a 100μs wide DC impulse. It shows no linearity issues at all, they all overlay. The AKG K701 look almost identical to the K702 and K712 PRO. Frequency response graphs are your friend here. As the seal of a headphone is of importance some experiments are done to see the effect. By contrast, the K712s are much smoother through this frequency region and, as a consequence, are more revealing of detail in the mix. Think of it as flavours, like in ice-cream. That way when you see a frequency response graph, you'll know how deviations from a given target are going to impact the music that you listen to. Awesome graphs, thanks for that - Yeah it'd make sense for them to use the new (at the time) pads in some ongoing designs. AKG K612. The AKG K702 are slightly better headphones than the AKG K701, but overall are very similar. However, the AKG are well-built but don’t feel as durable since they don’t have a full metal frame like the Beyerdynamic. The treble response is a bit ‘jagged’ and has a typical ‘AKG signature’. We’ll get into that in a bit. They're super comfortable headphones with a few more accessories than the K701 or the K702.However, like the previous models, they're a bit bulky and cumbersome for everyday use. However, the headband has a lot of moving parts for the adjustable padding. Long ago, the K701/702 were both designed and manufactured in Austria. These pads aren’t cheap though. Their advanced 30 mm XXL transducers with patented Varimotion diaphragms deliver a wide dynamic range, increased sensitivity and high sound levels, while their semi-open design provides a solid bass range and extremely clear highs. The AKG K7XX (red) is a Drop only product. It powered my old AKG K500 enough to even give it some more slam in the low-end. Only when there is a substantial seal breach one will notice lower bass notes are subdued. The open back ear cups are large and circular and covered in a suede-like padding that gives the headphones a premium appeal. The AKG K701 is a an oldie. Some people will be disappointed this headphone only has a 3-pin mini XLR plug because this headphone cannot be connected to balanced amplifiers. With some music there is sibilance. Below an aid to help determining the sound character of headphones with relation to the frequency response. 160 St-Viateur Est, Suite 408, Montreal, Canada, H2T 1A8. ... the extremely linear frequency response range means these headphones aren’t going to impress lovers of loud volumes and big bass changes. The headphone feels and is quite sturdy. : 113dB This tool will clearly show you the differences, Use our data and table to find the best headphones for your needs, Want to see us review a specific headphones? However, I quickly become tired of the sharpness and was looking for a way to make it sound "warmer". They have the same retro design with large circular ear cups and a headband with a self-adjusting strap. They purposely don't block any ambient noise, which is not ideal for the level of noise on a busy commute. ... i.e. The AKG K240 Studio over-ear, semi-open headphones are designed for professional applications such as mixing, mastering and playback. The AKG K702 has a ‘bright’ tonal balance similar to the K701. Deviations in different severities at different frequency bands have an effect on the sound character. They will sound great with high-res audio and an amp. Drum hits etc. Isolation: low (open headphone) AKG Pro Audio K702 Over-Ear, … But if the process is similar to the physical way of frequency reflections of studio monitor speakers in the room (bass frequency waves remain longer in the room than higher frequency waves), then the AKG K702 could bring a fairly flat sound reproduction to the sensory celly in your ears. In terms of the AKG k702 and k712, both are problematic for translation, but they are useful in other ways I'm sure. To test this the headphone is measured via a low impedance amplifier (0.2Ω) and a high impedance amplifier (120Ω). While the Sennheiser have slightly less low-bass than the AKG, they have a better-balanced treble range and are more stable on the head. Below the spectrum plot of the K702 (Right channel). There still is a resonance which the filter can not remove. The AKG K702 and the Philips SHP9500 are both great audiophile headphones if you like a neutral sound. The bigger the deviation the stronger the effect. ... As for the K702 it is mostly used for mid to high frequency referencing, the bass response is really nonexistent. The mids from 200Hz to 1kHz are pretty flat and make the mids sound ‘neutral’. It is available in black with very dark blue and matte aluminium accents. This video sums up the Philips Fidelio X2hr, especially the frequency response graph. Vivamus gravida January 19, 2016. Frequency response range – Most of the headphones will have at least 20Hz – 20,000Hz (5Hz – 20kHz) frequency response range. Around 2kHz there is a little lingering (the small bump in the FR, it seems happy to vibrate at that frequency) but is very low in level. Comparison Tools. Some experiments were done on the K701 and will be the same for the K702. However, they pretty big and bulky for everyday use. They have two-tone navy blue and silver color scheme and an old-school retro design that will work for some. What’s clearly visible is that AKG stuck to the AKG house sound over all the years. The open back ear cups are large and circular and covered in a suede-like padding that gives the headphones a premium appeal. You want flat because then the sound your working on is actually there in the audio and it will translate better to other speakers and systems. Usage: Home, Studio Collapsible: no so that you can compare the results easily. Most measurement sites have some smoothing applied which ‘irons flat’ sharp peaks and ‘wiggles’. Type: On-ear, open I sent an email to AKG asking if the design had been modified in order to make it more appealing to the larger numbers of audiophiles at the expense of the relatively small number of recording studio enthusiasts. These are potential weak points where the headphones could get damaged through wear and tear. You need to drive it from a amplifier or source that can provide enough voltage into 62Ω. When they eventually do graph the 612 I’ll update the chart. © 2021 9298-5266 Quebec Inc. All Rights Reserved. The K7XX is much less bright and sharp sounding and relatively bassier as a result. The mids look better as the measured signal looks more like the applied square-wave but does show overshoot and a lot of ringing. This way the plots are overlaid and it is easier to show the tonal balance differences.The headphone does not react much to higher output resistances other than in level (9.4dB). On the other hand, the AKG don't feel as tight as the Beyerdynamic, which is more comfortable for … type: open back fit: circumaural (over ear) impedance: 250 Ohms frequency response: 5 Hz – 35,000 Hz material: velour ear pads, rugged plastic, metal headband: spring steel, soft cushioning … vs. AKG K712 Pro. Not designed for sports. Usually I don’t post them unless something is wrong but in this case I will post the plot. AKG K702 - With the K702, AKG adds a studio headphone heavyweight to its portfolio, with precise sound reproduction for mixing and mastering applications. The K702 are comfortable and reproduce tracks with great fidelity. Immediately after unpacking this device, it’s easy to appreciate the aesthetics. In order to get an idea of the headphones you're most likely to enjoy, it's important to also understand how different frequency response ranges impact sound signature. Below the frequency response of the K702 (Left, Right)There is a slight but not audible channel imbalance. Here you can vote for our next review, Compare graphs from our headphones test results in order to make a clearer and more informed decision, We buy our own products to test. Although these headphones are quite loud and leak a lot, the profile of the leakage is narrower that most open headphones we have measured. The K702 is not difficult to drive though with its 62Ω impedance. The FR is like the branding at the side of the tub telling you the flavour of the ice cream. The AKG K612 is the successor of the K601. AKG K702. Female vocals are a bit more forward on the DT 880 Pro; sometimes the K7xx places acoustic instruments in front of female vocals, not that this is inherently a bad thing. Colour: white or black LEARN ABOUT FREQUENCY RESPONSE CONSISTENCY, Be the first to start a discussion about AKG K702. 'neutral', whereby all the frequencies are reproduced at roughly the same level across the audio spectrum), but after a few days of constantly working with them I became disenchanted because they sounded somewhat veiled … The Philips are also more comfortable for long listening sessions, although the AKG feel more durable. Headphones (full-size) ... Or one had been recently used and the other was brand new since frequency response changes with use. You may go with the K702 as overall it’s a bit more neutral sounding than the K712. Curabitur lobortis January 19, 2016. Driver size: ø 40mm Weight: 235 g. admin. AKG K702. The pads are large enough in inner diameter (60mm) and have a nice depth (25mm) so most ears will fit. And by Over-ear, It means that the earcups of this headphone cover the whole ears of the users. The step response plot below  (Left, Right)This plot shows the impulse response/clarity is accentuated and peaks out 4dB above the mids. They have dense ear cups, and their headband design is flexible enough to handle an above average amount of physical stress. Thank you so much for this. Long ago, the K701/702 were both designed and manufactured in Austria. Gain early access to all tests results for new products, Prices will now be listed directly in reviews and tables, Have 5 votes per product category to choose which product we’ll review next, Gain unlimited access to detailed test results in tools and results (no blurred results), Best Wireless Bluetooth Earbuds For Running, Best Noise Cancelling Headphones Under $200, Best Wireless Bluetooth Earbuds Under $50, Best Noise Cancelling Earbuds And In-Ears, Best Wireless Bluetooth Headphones Under $100, Best Noise Cancelling Headphones Under $100, Video: The 3 Best Gaming Headsets For PS5 (2021), Wyze Noise-Cancelling Headphones Wireless Test Results, EPOS GTW 270 Hybrid Truly Wireless Review, Having trouble deciding between two headphones? It does not push hard on my head but one does feel a small contact point and the cups have a small tendency to drop a little lower in my case. The AKG Q701 are basically the same headphones as the AKG K702, but with slightly better sound performance. The 2nd harmonic distortion is probably lower than 0.2% around 1kHz as limits of the test rig are around that level. 10. share. Note: the rather large ‘dip’ aroound 3.5kHz in the K7XX (and K712) are a measurement error because there is no pinna. On the other hand, the AKG don't feel as tight as the Beyerdynamic, which is more comfortable for long listening sessions. S.P.L. voltage: 3.5V Too unstable and cumbersome for use while doing any strenuous physical activity. The bigger the deviation the stronger the effect. A ‘horizontal‘ frequency response curve on the shown frequency response plots on this website thus indicates a perceived ‘flat’ tonal signature. The AKG K702 is a modernised K701. This makes the bass sound ‘light’ but ‘tight’. The open-back ear cups are well padded and covered in a suede-like fabric that gives the headphones a more premium appeal. Graphs 101: How to Read Headphone Measurements . frequency response graphs, … The bigger the deviation the stronger the effect. (Left and Right are superimposed) The narrow treble peaks (7kHz, 12kHz and 16kHz) are resonances.

Restaurant Turc à Volonté Paris, Vaccin Anti Tétanos Rappel, Seuil Admissibilité Crpe 2021, Différence Entre Déplacement Professionnel Et Détachement, Examen National Math Science Physique Biof 2020,